Medical device firms have good reason to dislike the healthcare reform law. You would, too, if Uncle Sam taxed you $20 billion to pay for it.
The industry warned the tax would crush innovation, especially for startups that can’t afford it. But tucked away in the law is a little-known tax credit designed to help those very companies.
The $1 billion Qualifying Therapeutic Discovery Project tax credit initially was supposed to help drug companies (perhaps a reward for pharma support of the reform law?) develop therapies that:
One billion dollars is nothing to sneeze at, and with early stage capital hard to find, the program should provide a much needed boost to the country’s biomedical industry.
Only companies with 250 employees or fewer can receive up to $5 million in credits. Startups with no tax liabilities can receive a maximum $244,000 grant.
The tax credit also acts as a stimulus for “projects that show the greatest potential to create and sustain high-quality, high-paying jobs in the United States, and to advance our competitiveness in the fields of life, biological and medical sciences.”
That’s awfully broad, so why shouldn’t medical device firms get some love? And some did.
MedCity News has learned that Pursuit Vascular Inc. in Blaine, Minnesota, has won a grant. The company, which won the biosciences category of last year’s Minnesota Cup, is developing a disposable catheter to prevent device-related blood infections, which it says costs Medicare $1.5 billion a year. Pursuit Vascular, which spun off from incubator Pursuit Medical Inc., also is LifeScience Alley’s New Technology Showcase winner.
I know of another University of Minnesota-related startup that won a $244,000 grant, but the company did not want to be identified.
Winners were just announced, so don’t be surprised to see more good news trickle in.

Comments
Post a comment
$20 billion tax – $1 billion grant = $19 billion tax. The grants go to cutting-edge biotech companies or those favored by certain bureaucrats. The $20 billion taxes broadly cover the device industry. It gives the government a little more leverage in deciding which technologies survive, by discouraging innovation among the taxed and encouraging it among those able to get grants. Grants can be good, but they are not a counterbalance to the taxes envisioned!
Comment by Frank Spaccarotella — November 4, 2010 @ 9:11 am
Fair enough Frank. But perhaps another way to look at it is this: $20 billion tax or….nothing at all. If you’re gonna get whacked, best that you get something out of it. And I really don’t think the 80 startups in Minnesota that received $24 million in tax and grants are really complaining, especially with early stage capital so hard to find.
Comment by Thomas Lee — November 4, 2010 @ 10:29 am
Post a Comment