With the permission of the editors at theHeart.org, a version of this post also appears on Trials and Fibrillations. I wasn’t going to write on this matter, but I changed my mind.
As a doctor in the mix, it seems appropriate to weigh in — ever so briefly.
First, take a deep cleansing breath.
I am highly conflicted about the Supreme Court’s decision. Part of my brain tells me that I should be stomping around in an inflamed state. But I don’t feel that way. Basically, I don’t feel much. It’s not that I think the case isn’t important. It is. Make no mistake: how we, as a nation, treat the less fortunate among us says a lot about who we are.
But really, did the decision matter? If the ACA was struck down, would a better system have emerged? In this political climate? Would an alternative system effectively solve our three most pressing healthcare problems: covering everyone, controlling costs and maintaining the sanctity of the doctor-patient relationship?
I doubt it. Especially since we can’t ever talk about doctors making mistakes, or that smart medicine does not mean more medicine. Less-is-more talk gets beat down as rationing, while goals-of-care discussions bring up death panels. There’s a lot of work to be done.
That’s why I’ve decided that all I can do is show up each day and work hard to positively affect the world in which I live. For me, as an experienced physician, this means working effectively in the healthcare system chosen by the people, whether I like it or not. I have to trust that the American people will choose wisely.
I’m a doctor. And doctoring allows me to do the most good. For this I am grateful.
As far as writing about healthcare issues, I’ll keep at, in the hope that my experience in the real world contributes constructively to the debate.
Reserve your seat now for MedCity CONVERGE, to be held July 9-10 in Philadelphia. Discover strategies, solutions and startups in healthcare innovation. Be a part of this gathering where the entire healthcare ecosystem converges.