This is why you must always, always proofread that journal article

Not sure how this made it through proofreading, peer review, and copyediting. Via http://t.co/sWaswaM2X4 #addedvalue pic.twitter.com/8krLlvthAr

— Dave Harris (@davidjayharris) November 10, 2014

In case you missed it, Will Oremus over at Slate tells the story behind the tweet:

presented by

Partnership Post

When Investment Rhymes with Canada

Canada has a proud history of achievement in the areas of science and technology, and the field of biomanufacturing and life sciences is no exception.

By Julien Rosan and Tina Kotrych - Global Affairs Canada

The blooper was picked up by Retraction Watch, which contacted both the authors and the publisher for comment. The corresponding author told Retraction Watch the Gabor line “was added into the paper by a co-author during revision (after peer review),” and no one spotted it in the course of the final proofreading process. He apologized for the put-down, adding, “I would never condone this sentiment towards another person or their work.”