MedCity Influencers

ACO performance update shows many struggle to learn from failures and successes

A number of the Pioneer ACOs dropped out of the program, so even the more “advanced” participants are not uniformly delivering the best possible results.

This blog post originally ran on David Harlow’s HealthBlawg

The Medicare Shared Savings Program is intended to lower costs and improve quality. If program participants succeed in meeting these goals, they are able to share in the savings — calculated by comparison to expected Medicare FFS expenditures for the same population if folks were not enrolled in an ACO.

Many program participants have complained that the criteria for being able to share in the savings were too tough. The latest version of the MSSP (ACO) regulations adding some flexibility in that department were finalized earlier this year. (See my post on the proposed ACO regulations; you may read the presser that links to the final version, too, as well as earlier posts on the ACO phenomenon.)

This week, CMS released data on ACO performance in 2014 (so the effects of the latest regs are obviously not reflected in this data). While the federales try to put a good face on it, the fact of the matter is that only about 1/4 of ACOs are in shared savings territory. The total savings (Pioneer ACOs and other MSSPs) only came to about $1B. One billion dollars sounds like a lot, but since the total Medicare spend is about $600B and about 15 percent of Medicare beneficiaries are enrolled in the MSSP program, that’s not a very impressive savings figure (it’s on the order of 1 percent, and does not demonstrate a sea change of the sort that we need).

The savings figures are inching up, and MSSPs (and, in particular, Pioneer ACOs) that have been at it longer seem to do better. However, a number of the Pioneer ACOs dropped out of the program, so even the more “advanced” participants are not uniformly delivering the best possible results.

There are certainly a number of alternative approaches to payment reform that have been floated, and CMMI continues to crank out new ideas, but there has been significant emphasis placed on the MSSP program as embodying CMS’s approach to value-based payment in the context of the broad effort to shift away from fee for service medicine.

One of the benefits of central planning on the scale of the Medicare program ought to be the ability to learn from successes, cull failures, and engage in an ongoing process of improvement. It seems that CMS is content to engage in watchful waiting at this point. (In theory, I believe that physician-led ACOs ought to be able to deliver better cost and quality improvements, but I have not seen data broken down by type of ACO in a way that would allow for confirmation of that hypothesis.)

It remains to be seen whether the revised regulations will allow MSSPs to deliver better results on the cost and quality fronts. Tune in again next year!

Photo: Money roll by Flickr user zack-attack


Avatar photo
Avatar photo

David Harlow

David Harlow is the Principal of The Harlow Group LLC, a health care law and consulting firm based in the Hub of the Universe, Boston, MA. His 30 years’ experience in the public and private sectors affords him a unique perspective on legal, policy and business issues facing the health care community. David is a charter member of the external Advisory Board of the Mayo Clinic Social Media Network and has served as the Public Policy Chair of the Society for Participatory Medicine, on the Health Law Section Council of the Massachusetts Bar Association and on the Advisory Board of FierceHealthIT. He speaks regularly before health care and legal industry groups on business, policy and legal matters. Keep track of what he is doing at HealthBlawg and on Twitter @healthblawg.

This post appears through the MedCity Influencers program. Anyone can publish their perspective on business and innovation in healthcare on MedCity News through MedCity Influencers. Click here to find out how.

Shares0
Shares0