Some Ohio emergency medical technicians could get the right to carry guns under a proposal in the state’s legislature.
This seems to be an increasingly hot-button topic among EMTs, who raise the issue as they struggle to cope with rough neighborhoods, threatening onlookers, violent situations, and armed and unstable patients. Skeptics, meanwhile, point out that emergency scenes are cleared first by the police or dispatchers, and adding a gun to the EMT kit would unnecessarily expand the job and risk of emergency workers.
Ohio’s legislation takes a narrow focus. House Bill 288 would give EMTs guns only when they went with SWAT teams. The law would also treat medical personnel like police in that they would have immunity from civil suits in connection with their use of guns when working with the SWAT team, said Republican Rep. Courtney Combs, the bill’s sponsor.
“It’s a bad situation if they call the SWAT team out,” Combs said. “For the protection of the medical professionals, they should have the right to carry firearms.”
“Personally, I’m a fan of it but the concern is what’s the [EMT's] motivation for being there? Is it just so you can carry a gun?” Brown said.
Brown acknowledged that there’s some controversy in the field of tactical medicine over whether medics should be armed. Brown believes the benefits outweigh the risks.
“If they’re armed for their own personal security, then that’s a good idea,” Brown said. “If they’re not armed, then the team has to task someone to be their security. Some teams are small and that winds up being problematic.”
EMTs wouldn’t be required to carry a gun under the legislation. The decision would be left up to EMTs and the SWAT teams they work with, Combs said.
Combs said the need for such a law was brought to his attention by his son-in-law, Dr. William Brady, an emergency physician in Kettering, Ohio, who sometimes works with the Warren County SWAT team.
The Ohio State Medical Association, the state’s largest physicians’ group, hasn’t taken a position on the legislation, a spokesman said. The president of the Ohio Association of Emergency Medical Services wasn’t available for comment. Combs said he hadn’t yet consulted with the emergency services group, but plans to contact interested parties within the next few months.
It’s unclear how many, or if any, states have similar laws. A spokeswoman for the National Association of Emergency Medical Technicians said it advocates at a federal level and isn’t involved in state legislation.
The bill hasn’t been assigned to a committee and no hearings will be scheduled until Ohio lawmakers return from their break in September, Combs said.
Photo from flickr user mikejmartelli

Comments
Post a comment
Every EMT with a concealed permit should have the right to carry a firearm concealed. This Bill simply authorizes certain EMTs to carry with SWAT, and provides civil immunity. Why should I surrender my right to self defense when I get on an ambulance and respond to dangerous and unknown situations? I carry a firearm for protection while off duty, and I avoid such situations, but I understand the meaning of ‘random violence.’ Meanwhile citizens trust EMTs with their very lives. Seems pretty counterintuitive to keep EMTs unarmed, doesn’t it?
Comment by paramedic70002 — July 18, 2011 @ 5:02 pm
I worked as a paramedic for 7 years with a private ambulance company. I responded to calls in the worst neighborhoods in Cleveland. Not once did we have the benefit of police securing the scene. Many times we were in danger b/c of armed and/or violent people at the scene. That was back in the 80′s. Now, it’s 100 times worse than back in my day. For some reason private ambulance personnel are completely forgotten about when laws like this are being created.
Comment by Gary Siwik — July 19, 2011 @ 6:01 am
in cleveland ohio emts are issues kevlar vests. that doesnt sound safe at all! a weapon wouldnt be bad. why not start small like a tazer?
Comment by Levi — July 19, 2011 @ 7:51 am
As a former EMT-Paramedic I gotta say I wish we woulda been able to have a concealed weapon when someone stuck a gun in my face more than once! Thankfully nothing ever became of those situations… But what if?
Comment by CJ — July 19, 2011 @ 9:21 am
Ohio Law does not allow fire investigators who work for a township fire department the right to carry a weapon but the elected officials want to pass a bill first allowing EMT to carry? This makes no sense as township investigators are on the front lines of investigations and not permitted to carry. Townships today are larger than when the law was past in 1953 only allowing cities investigators to carry weapons. State investigators can be called into assist with investigations but cannot be involved in every aspect due to manpower and overtime. I would support this bill if investigators were added with a minimum years of service in investigations, certain certifications, letter of support from local police chief and weapon training with yearly qualification mandatory.
Comment by Chief Hogue — July 21, 2011 @ 2:34 pm
Post a Comment