Dr. Steven Nissen, chair of Cleveland Clinic’s cardiovascular medicine department, talks about why head-to-head clinical trials of competing drugs and devices would benefit patients.
“In medicine, we have many alternative therapies for patients,” he said. “What we need to know to take good care of our patients is which of these therapies is best.”
Nissen spoke at the Cleveland Clinic Medical Innovation Summit.

Comments
Post a comment
Bravo! This is long overdue
Comment by Hans-Harald Lutzmann — October 5, 2011 @ 11:15 am
I agree with Dr. Nissen. As a previous chair of a large teaching hospital Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee, which later became the Therapeutics Committee, we started down this path in 2004 and created a new healthcare economic model called Thereconomics, which I have two publications on and present during Comparative Effectiveness presentations and have presented as part of Health Care Reform discusions and to the AHRQ. What is best for a patient: Surgery, a drug, a device,? What about diagnostics: what is best clinical study-lab, radiology, etc? It goes beyond drug to drug head to hea studies.
Comment by Fred J. Pane, R.Ph, FASHP — October 11, 2011 @ 6:41 am
Post a Comment