Want to know what's happening next in healthcare?

MedCityNews is the leading online news source for the business of innovation in healthcare.


“MedCity news is a peerless national resource for those of us who really want to stay on top the very latest news in healthcare from incumbents to startups. ”

Elliot Menschik, DreamIt Ventures partner; Venturef0rth founder; Penn professor


Sign up for our daily newsletter


Here’s take 2 of legislative effort to repeal the 2.3 percent medical device tax

1:03 pm by | 0 Comments

TaxBurdenIf at first you don’t succeed, try, try again.

That seems to be the mantra of Minnesota’s congressional delegation as it relates to the highly unpopular 2.3 percent medical device tax that went into effect in January.

The Star Tribune is reporting that Rep. Erik Paulsen, a Republican, has introduced a new bill, after the last one passed the house but didn’t make it to the Senate, to kill the medical device tax with help from Wisconsin’s Rep. Ron Kind, a Democrat. What’s more, Minnesota’s Democratic senators Amy Klobuchar and Al Franken are also entering the fray with a bill that they are supposed to introduce Thursday. This creates a companion bill to Paulsen’s repeal bill in the House.

Some companies are already cutting jobs because of the tax burden and some have loudly protested. But the leaders of the medical device world — the likes of Medtronic have deliberately stayed away from the controversy.

Advertisement

Ryan Baird, a spokesman with LifeScience Alley, a trade association representing the device and life sciences industries in Minnesota, said that unlike pharmaceutical companies that will get new customers with the expansion of the uninsured population, device makers, especially in Minnesota, cater to a older population already covered by Medicare. Therefore, they cannot share in the additional bounty pharma firms will get. Which makes the tax an unfair burden, especially at a time of broad macroeconomic changes.

Still, he acknowledged it’s an uphill battle to repeal the device tax.

As they say, it’s like closing the barn door after the cow has already left the barn. Not to mention there appears to be no real plan on how to pay for the lost revenue from repealing that portion of the law.

[Photo Credit: Tax burden from BigStock Photos]

 

Copyright 2014 MedCity News. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Arundhati Parmar

By Arundhati Parmar

Arundhati Parmar is the Medical Devices Reporter at MedCity News. She has covered medical technology since 2008 and specialized in business journalism since 2001. Parmar has three degrees from three continents - a Bachelor of Arts in English from Jadavpur University, Kolkata, India; a Masters in English Literature from the University of Sydney, Australia and a Masters in Journalism from Northwestern University in Chicago. She has sworn never to enter a classroom again.
More posts by Author

0 comments