Healthcare road show I’d like to see: Tech-loving Khosla vs. flesh and blood doctor

The Doctor by Luke FildesAs I watched venture capitalist Vinod Khosla rail against physician misdiagnoses and advocate minimizing their role in the examining room in favor of medtech, it was great to see his point of view contrasted with Dr Abraham Verghese of Stanford Medical School. Verghese’s perspective offered a breath of fresh air to the discussion, championing the value of a physical diagnosis, reminding the audience the value physicians offer and what might be lost by dismissing their significance.

He might describe himself as a traditional physician, emphasizing the importance of human contact in the exam room, but Verghese carries some fairly non-traditional devices in his black doctor’s bag, such as a portable ultrasound device.

It was a neat contrast set up by the organizers of Stanford Graduate School of Business’ Healthcare Innovation Summit and made for some decent theater. Khosla talked about the pervasiveness of misdiagnosis and role that good doctors could play in improving the next generation of diagnostic tools to make them and sub-par doctors better at what they do and the benefits of surgically removing compassion from the diagnostic process. Verghese championed compassion as a medical tool of sorts that’s important to communicating a diagnosis to patients and quoted Francis Peabody: “The secret of the care of the patient is in caring for the patient.” Khosla was passionate about the need to be dispassionate.

He even got Khosla to temper his argument a little from saying 80 percent of what doctors do will be done by machines to saying that technology amplifies what physicians do and can improve their performance.


“I am not minimizing the fact that emotions play a role,” Khosla said at one point, “but a tool devoid of comfort can be an effective diagnostic.”

The best thing about pairing Khosla and Verghese wasn’t just the fact that they each had important points to make. It was that you couldn’t listen to them without rethinking, even a little, the balance of technology and human contact to improve patient outcomes, particularly as physician shortages deepen and individuals are confronted with tougher decisions on the best way to allocate resources for their healthcare. It should be required viewing, particularly for those who feel 100 percent committed to one perspective or the other.