Taxes on the rich. New taxes on businesses. Taxes on sugar-laden cereals, tobacco and alcoholic beverages — all have been floated as potential ways to pay for the nation’s health care reform.
How about a value-added tax? proposed the Wall Street Journal Health blog.
With Pres. Barack Obama talking about a trillion-dollar-plus expansion of health coverage, the value-added tax — a kind of national sales tax — has been making new friends in Washington, according to the Washington Post.
With the Rise of AI, What IP Disputes in Healthcare Are Likely to Emerge?
Munck Wilson Mandala Partner Greg Howison shared his perspective on some of the legal ramifications around AI, IP, connected devices and the data they generate, in response to emailed questions.
Common around the world, including in Europe, a value-added tax has been taboo in the United States. But advocates say few other options could raise enough money to enable the nation to sidestep financial calamity in the name of health care reform, the Post said.
A VAT is a tax on the transfer of goods and services that ultimately is paid by the consumer, according to the Post. It would increase the cost of just about everything, from a carton of eggs to a visit with a lawyer. It also is highly regressive. That is, it would fall largely on the poor.
But Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel, who is a White House health care advisor, said in his 2008 book “Healthcare, Guaranteed,” that a 10 percent VAT could pay for every American not entitled to Medicare or Medicaid to enroll in a health plan with no deductibles and minimal copayments, according to the WSJ Health blog.
During a White house conference earlier this year on government budget problems, a roomful of tax experts pleaded with Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner to consider a VAT, the Washington newspaper said.
“I think a VAT and a high-end income tax have got to be on the table,” Sen. Kent Conrad, the North Dakota Democrat, told the Post during an interview.
More stories worth a read:
- NABE: Economists forecast modest rebound beginning in 3rd quarter (Business Courier of Cincinnati)
- New York City to pay $2 million in death after hospital wait (New York Times)
- Warring sides on health care carry their fight to TV and radio ads (New York Times)
- ‘Underlying conditions’ may add to flu worries (New York Times)
- Deaths linked to swine flu hit 108 worldwide (Boston Globe)
- FDA message on drug ads: Don’t bury risk information (Wall Street Journal Health blog)
- ConbinatoRX shares surge on diabetes data (FierceBiotech)
- Supreme Court will hear Merck appeal in Vioxx shareholder lawsuit (Wall Street Journal Health blog)
- UnitedHealth shares ideas for saving $540 million (Minneapolis-St. Paul Star Tribune)
- Massachusetts, model for universal health care, sees ups and downs in policy (New York Times)
- Healthcare cuts would mean higher costs and possibly deaths, officials warn (Los Angeles Times)
- Nurse visits for at-risk kids face budget risks (Associated Press/Mansfield News Journal)
- Cuyahoga County in talks to buy three parcels for medical mart building (Cleveland Plain Dealer)
- Summa, Crystal Clinic complete merger (Akron Beacon Journal)
- Top 5 takeaways on innovation and entrepreneurship from Tim Draper of DFJ (Xconomy | Seattle)