The recently-approved MRI-safe active-fixation lead from Medtronic (left lead in each frame) is compared to their conventional active-fixation lead. The arrow denotes the radio-opaque marker that can be seen on x-ray to identify the type of lead in the patient’s body. A fluoro image of the two leads is shown below, again with Medtronic’s MRI-safe lead on the left:
While the engineering hurdles were no doubt considerable to make an MRI-safe pacemaker lead, given the growing body of evidence that newer pacemakers (when carefully monitored) can be scanned in MRI machines, I suspect the biggest difference in these leads is not their design per se, but rather the regulatory paperwork (and research) that had to be completed to document their safety.
Of course, the fact that CMS would not pay for MRI scans performed on patients with pacemakers before the advent of these newer devices probably also limited the number of scans performed.
Westby G. Fisher, MD, FACC is a board certified internist, cardiologist, and cardiac electrophysiologist (doctor specializing in heart rhythm disorders) practicing at NorthShore University HealthSystem in Evanston, IL, USA and is a Clinical Associate Professor of Medicine at University of Chicago's Pritzker School of Medicine. He entered the blog-o-sphere in November, 2005. He writes regularly at Dr. Wes. DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed in this blog are strictly the those of the author(s) and should not be construed as the opinion(s) or policy(ies) of NorthShore University HealthSystem, nor recommendations for your care or anyone else's. Please seek professional guidance instead.
This post appears through the MedCity Influencers program. Anyone can publish their perspective on business and innovation in healthcare on MedCity News through MedCity Influencers. Click here to find out how.