Sponsored Post, Startups

Another way to mitigate risk in healthcare venture capital

We all want the 12x, but what happens when you’re the 1x – and how do you make sure nothing goes wrong?

This post is sponsored by Lake Whillans, a distressed venture capital and litigation finance firm that helps companies facing litigation or arbitration.

Many venture capital investments go on to become Tesla, Amazon, or the next life-saving drug. But about 65% of venture financings return 0-1x.

Many of these low-return investments fail simply by virtue of the high-risk nature of venture capital: the product never garners adoption, or a competitor develops more rapidly. These are anticipated risks, and top venture capitalists can be valuable in their ability to help their portfolio companies adroitly navigate these pitfalls.

Some of these investments, however, fail because a strategic partner misappropriates a trade secret, or a buyer breaches a contract, or an established player seeks to illegally preclude a startup’s development. Venture capitalists are not as well equipped to navigate these pitfalls, and when faced with these challenges might not be in a position to devote fresh capital and resources to defend the portfolio company.

A few reasons why:

  • Difficulty assessing the prospect of success: venture investors are often ex-entrepreneurs and/or possess great domain expertise in an area of innovation. Assessing a legal claim is typically not a core specialty and quantifying an investment in a legal claim can be a treacherous endeavor, and outsourcing that task to a litigator may not be an option.
  • Risk/Reward may not align with target investments: as the post linked to above indicates, venture capitalists make the vast majority of their returns from a few portfolio companies that generate outsized (20x or so) returns. While a portfolio company may have a valuable and meritorious claim, realistic damages are often less than what would have been achieved had the company become a dominant player in the relevant market. Therefore, it may not make economic sense for a venture capitalist to reinvest in a company that has a relatively low ceiling for return when compared to their target investment returns.
  • Fund/Investment Size: many venture capital firms raise relatively small funds (on the order of $100M – $200M). It would be difficult for these firms to invest $5+ million in a legal claim without significantly overallocating the fund’s resources.

Litigation funding companies, such as Lake Whillans, can help venture capital portfolio companies that have nowhere else to turn. In these scenarios, litigation financiers can provide financing to both sustain the company’s operations and pursue any legal remedies.

Lake Whillans, for example, does not face the same obstacles that venture capitalists do. Our investment team is composed of lawyers whose core expertise is assessing legal claims; our business model accounts for lower returns on a per investment basis than a typical venture capitalist; and 100% of our capital is dedicated to investing in legal claims.

This column is one in a series by Lake Whillans Litigation Finance. To learn more about us, distressed venture capital and litigation finance generally, visit us at our website, lakewhillans.com. To ask a specific question, suggest a topic, or simply say hello, drop us a line at [email protected].

This post appears through the MedCity Influencers program. Anyone can publish their perspective on business and innovation in healthcare on MedCity News through MedCity Influencers. Click here to find out how.