Easing Frontline Pressure: How AI Can Lift the Administrative Burden Off Care Teams

“The primary concern for burnout is not being able to emotionally take care of each patient individually or uniquely.” 

That reflection, shared recently by a respiratory therapist, captures a growing crisis in healthcare where emotional exhaustion collides with rising administrative burden. As physicians and nurses face labor shortages and an aging population, many find themselves buried under tasks that pull them further from patient care.

Juggling prior insurance authorizations, intake forms, and post-visit follow-ups — all structured, repeatable tasks — has become a major driver of record-high burnout rates and threatens the quality of that care itself.

Agentic AI offers promise to relieve some of these non-clinical interruptions. These systems autonomously pursue goals without constant human input. Rather than simply flagging issues, its potential is in acting on them. Data shows that when administrative processes are fully optimized with automation, clinicians can save an incredible 70 minutes per patient visit.

Agentic AI’s promise

AI agents are advancing from novelty to necessity in healthcare administration, especially in rule-based communication workflows. In late 2024, 97% of surveyed physicians reported administrative burnout, referencing prior insurance authorization as a burden they are looking to address. 

Against this backdrop, AI agents can offer huge support. While chatbots or LLMs can answer patient questions or summarize documents, AI “agents” are systems that can follow logic, access APIs, track context across steps, and collaborate with each other. Startups are looking closely at clinical workflows and breaking them into smaller tasks that can be automated in this way.

For insurance pre-authorization workflows, one agent retrieves patient history and insurance details via secure APIs. Meanwhile, another validates eligibility criteria and submits the prior authorization request. Together, they can automate the full prior authorization process based on clinical documentation and insurance policies.

As administrative pressures rise and trust in automation grows, agentic AI is quietly becoming the connective tissue between overburdened care teams and the systems meant to support them. Realizing its full potential, however, depends on a clear understanding of where its strengths end and human judgment must take over.

Understanding the limitations

According to a 2024 survey, while 66% of physicians were using healthcare AI, only 35% felt more excitement than concern. One of the greatest anxieties surrounding AI agents is trusting them to operate autonomously on critical tasks, and it is vital that healthcare leaders clearly understand their limitations so they can implement safe use cases confidently. 

Post-procedure check-ins for routine outpatient surgeries are one of those use cases that can be automated safely. After procedures like cataract surgery or endoscopy, patients often need reminders to follow specific instructions, such as medication adherence or diet changes, and report on symptoms. 

Agents can help by sending personalized follow-up messages based on procedure type and patient profile. In tandem, another agent can monitor responses, flagging any signs of complication such as pain or fever for clinical review. The process is structured, time-bound, and follows predictable decision trees, making it well-suited for safe automation with escalation protocols in place.

Where agentic AI falls short is in interactions that require deep empathy and nuanced communication. Any emotional support after a terminal diagnosis must come directly from the nurse so that they can navigate grief and complex treatment discussions.

Ensuring AI confidence

Agentic AI may be powerful, but its impact depends entirely on whether frontline staff feel confident using it. In healthcare, where the margin for error is narrow and the stakes are high, even the most advanced systems must earn clinicians’ trust. That trust starts with clarity, control, and collaboration — ensuring that care teams understand exactly what the agent is doing and have the ability to intervene when necessary.

Leaders must prioritize giving frontline healthcare workers visibility into what the agent is doing, how it’s making decisions, and what data it’s using to act. This includes showing which clinical rules or business logic the agent is following, what information it’s pulling from the EHR or API, and why it’s triggering a specific follow-up or action.

In high-stakes environments like healthcare, trust depends on interpretability. Clinicians need to know not just that something happened but also how and why it happened. This allows them to step in and override or adjust actions when needed and feel confident that the system is working with them, not around them. Healthtech providers must ensure AI agents show clear audit trails for every task completed and build verification into the user journey. 

AI agents excel in operating within compliance frameworks, offloading structured tasks while escalating edge cases to human providers. They show great promise in helping reclaim clinical capacity and reduce the mounting administration associated with modern medicine. However, to ease pressure on the front lines, AI agents must be trusted. When thoughtfully implemented so that care teams can see how decisions are made and step in when needed, these tools can lift the weight of routine tasks and give frontline workers the space to prioritize their patients.

Photo: iodrakon, Getty Images

This post appears through the MedCity Influencers program. Anyone can publish their perspective on business and innovation in healthcare on MedCity News through MedCity Influencers. Click here to find out how.