MedCity Influencers

What ‘The Pitt’ Gets Right About Emergency Medicine — and What It Reveals About Healthcare IT

Some of the most powerful scenes aren’t the dramatic saves, but the quiet moments when clinicians connect with patients amid the chaos. Healthcare teams deserve access systems that allow for more of those moments.

A dynamic 3D illustration featuring a long, curved arrow with focus circles along its path, each marked with a check signifying approval and progress. On both sides of the arrow are 3D mechanical gears, also containing check marks at their centers. This design symbolizes process flow, efficiency, and successful task completion. The interconnection of the arrow and gears visually conveys the seamless interaction and synchronization of components in a workflow. Ideal for concepts such as project management, quality assurance, and operational excellence, the design's modern aesthetic and bold 3D elements make it visually compelling and informative.

As a practicing emergency physician, I appreciate watching HBO’s The Pitt, because it offers a reasonably realistic depiction of what it’s like to work on the front lines of today’s emergency departments. It’s fast-paced, the stakes are high, and there is little margin for error. Sure, the show packs months’ worth of clinical intensity into a handful of episodes, but the content is relevant, capturing the ethos of what it’s like to be the safety net for society’s patients. 

Clinical care often demands split-second decisions made in environments stretched to the limit: overcrowded departments, staffing shortages, and clinicians carrying both emotional and administrative burdens. As the show captures, we are under constant pressure in a chronically under-staffed and under-resourced environment, so time is of the essence.

It might not be obvious on the show, but in real life, there is a quiet friction behind every clinical decision: logging in to systems, re-authenticating, hunting for passwords, navigating locked workstations, managing access privileges, and complying with an ever-expanding web of regulatory requirements. 

Granted, this friction is less cinematic, but believe me, it is no less consequential. Today, identity management has become a matter of patient safety, clinician burnout, and federal compliance. While fixing identity won’t solve staffing shortages or ER overcrowding, it can remove a persistent layer of drag in a system already operating beyond capacity.

Clinician access determines care quality

In one episode featuring a mass casualty incident, clinicians seamlessly move from triage to intubation to family updates and back. Scenes like these in The Pitt demonstrate how good clinicians navigate the inherent chaos with teamwork and smooth workflows, ultimately delivering high quality care. The last thing we need in times like this, is technology and administrative burden getting in the way. 

Most of the doctors and nurses I know do not complain about the grueling clinical work, because that is what we signed up for. We are well aware that medicine demands long hours, personal sacrifice, and emotional resilience. What damages morale, and increasingly the quality of care, are the obstacles and systems that prevent us from doing our jobs efficiently. In an environment defined by scarcity, every unnecessary click matters.

A clinician in a hospital may log into the EHR dozens of times per shift. Multiply that across medication dispensing systems, imaging platforms, secure messaging tools, and other clinical applications, and you quickly see how authentication becomes a constant interruption. And when these delays pile up, waiting rooms fill, admitted patients board for hours, and administrators track decreasing margins.

Slow or cumbersome access doesn’t make systems more secure. Clinicians will find workarounds like shared passwords, sticky note credentials, or leaving unattended sessions open. Not because they’re careless, but because they’re operating in an environment where seconds matter. 

Minor inefficiencies eventually lead to clinician fatigue and increase the potential for error. In a system already stretched thin, identity friction accumulates into meaningful risk. 

CMS, compliance, and data integrity

The Pitt often captures physicians documenting complicated cases, knowing that what they write will guide the next shift. 

Clinical documentation can be burdensome, but it can help clinicians communicate with one another and coordinate care. It is also necessary for billing and compliance. Documentation determines reimbursement, quality scores, and financial viability for healthcare organizations.

Beyond patient care, identity has become central to federal compliance. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) continues to raise standards for data integrity, auditability, and program oversight. Accurate clinical documentation, order entry, and billing data are essential for reimbursement, regulatory compliance, and fraud prevention. 

CMS programs require knowing who provides care and when they provide it. Weak identity controls complicate audit trails, as shared credentials or poorly managed access privileges can expose organizations to compliance risks and financial penalties. 

Meanwhile, healthcare organizations face increasing scrutiny under HIPAA Security Rule requirements that mandate appropriate access controls, unique user identification, and audit capabilities. The seamless documentation portrayed in The Pitt assumes trust in the system. In reality, that trust depends on a strong identity infrastructure. Especially in an era of razor-thin operating margins and rising labor costs, where compliance failures are existential.

In today’s environment, identity and access management isn’t just an IT function; it’s part of an organization’s financial, legal, and reputational foundation. While it won’t repair every pain point of emergency care economics, it can protect organizations already navigating them.

Passwordless is essential infrastructure

Between scenes in The Pitt, clinicians move from patient to patient without friction. Badge swipes open medication cabinets, and charts are available instantly. This workflow reflects the critical need for access that keeps pace with care amid a relentless divide between demand and resources.

Password-based access models were designed for static office environments, not dynamic clinical settings. They contribute to workflow inefficiencies and administrative friction that fuel burnout, and they remain vulnerable to compromise. Healthcare needs authentication models built for mobility, shared devices, and high-acuity care environments.

In practice, this looks like seamless authentication through badge-based tap-in and out systems, biometrics, or app-based MFA. No complex passwords to memorize. The result: faster access, stronger compliance posture, and fewer risky workarounds. Access like that portrayed in The Pitt gives clinicians invaluable time that can be redirected to patients. It doesn’t create more staff or open more beds, but it gives back minutes during shifts where minutes are the only currency available.

Practical steps for healthcare leaders

Identity modernization should be treated as a strategic infrastructure investment, not an IT upgrade. The smooth handoffs in The Pitt don’t happen by accident, but by design. In the real world, infrastructure decisions must acknowledge that healthcare delivery is under systemic strain. The goal isn’t perfection, but friction reduction.

Healthcare leaders looking to invest in such infrastructure should consider a few actionable steps.

  1. Map identity friction to clinical risk: assess friction points in high-acuity areas like the emergency department and ICU to identify where authentication delays affect care delivery or foster unsafe workarounds.
  2. Align security and clinical leadership: secure buy-in from beyond security and IT teams, ensuring that CMIOs, CMOs, CISOs, and compliance leaders collaborate on the identity strategy so it reflects clinical realities.
  3. Prioritize phishing-resistant MFA and passwordless pilots: evaluate badge-based, biometrics, or FIDO2-aligned authentication approaches that reduce password reliance while strengthening security.
  4. Integrate identity governance with workflow lifecycle: automate provisioning and deprovisioning tied to HR systems to reduce inappropriate access risk and improve audit readiness.
  5. Measure what matters: track login times, session-switching efficiency, password reset volume, and user satisfaction to optimize the identity strategy in real time.

Some of the most powerful scenes in The Pitt aren’t the dramatic saves, but the quiet moments when clinicians connect with patients amid the chaos. Healthcare teams deserve access systems that allow for more of those moments. Systems as simple as they’re often portrayed in the show; a split-second badge tap and you’re in. Identity will not fix the macro conditions facing healthcare, but it can remove one layer of friction in a system that often feels impossible. 

If we want the best care quality, data integrity, and clinician experience, we must treat identity as the critical healthcare infrastructure it is. When every second counts, access shouldn’t be the obstacle.

Photo: narvo vexar, Getty Images

Dr. Sean Kellyis the Chief Medical Officer (CMO) and Sr. VP of Customer Strategy for Healthcare at Imprivata, where he leads the company’s Clinical Workflow team and advises on the clinical practice of healthcare IT security.

This post appears through the MedCity Influencers program. Anyone can publish their perspective on business and innovation in healthcare on MedCity News through MedCity Influencers. Click here to find out how.