
Washington State Gov. Christine Gregoire is an outspoken supporter of most of President Obama's health care reforms.
SEATTLE, Washington — The fraying of the Medicaid system has many indicators, and one of them is Connie Baugh’s stockings, according to the New York Times.
Baugh recently received a letter from Washington State saying as a result of budget cuts, Medicaid could no longer pay for the compression stockings that support her circulation and keep her aching leg ulcers from flaring, the Times said. At $239 a pair, the stockings take up more than one-third of the Social Security check Baugh lives on.
Some governors fear such cutbacks — produced by a recession that eroded state budgets and swelled Medicaid ranks — will be worsened by health care reform being crafted in Washington, D.C., the Times said. The governors worry Congress will give the states expensive new Medicaid responsibilities without providing the money to pay for them.
“We can’t afford to have Congress raise the eligibility for Medicaid coverage without paying for it,” said Christine Gregoire, Washington State’s Democratic governor, during an interview with the Times. States’ fears were stoked last week as House lawmakers drafting reform legislation reached a compromise with conservative “Blue Dog” Democrats that would force states to shoulder a greater Medicaid burden than an earlier version of the bill, the Time said.
In most cases, Gregoire is an outspoken supporter of President Obama’s efforts to overhaul health care. But she knows her state’s Medicaid program already is under strain. Doug Porter, Washington State’s Medicaid director, warns that an increasingly thin safety net could break if Congress makes more people eligible for Medicaid, according to the Times.
The Congressional Budget Office has projected that federal Medicaid spending under the house bill could increase (pdf) by more than $430 billion over 10 years, the Times said. The question is, how much of that increase would be borne by the states?
On Thursday, senior members of the Senate Finance Committee, which is at the forefront of crafting bipartisan reform legislation, heard from governers and Democratic senators that their proposals might be unaffordable to states and to many low-income people, the New York Times said in a separate story.
More stories worth a read:

Comments
Post a comment
There are $20 alternatives to the $239 wound stockings … that work great, are more comfortable. I’ve had good luck on wound healing with EdemaWear from a small company, http://www.compressiondynamics.com Of course, big med firms don’t want to let them into the marketplace.
EdemaWear at first looks underwhelming, but the one-way stretch truly works, helps circulation and drainage. Because I know Ms. Baugh’s pain, I’m going to try to send her some. She deserves a better alternative.
Thanks.
Joseph Constantine
Comment by Joseph Constantine — August 9, 2009 @ 2:43 pm
NOT AMAZING; ONLY AMAZINGLY EXPENSIVE
As a vascular surgeon, “The New York Times†story on $239 compression stockings caught my attention and caused me to respond
Health care reform is a crushing reality and the “Times†article puzzled me. Why stockings in an elderly woman?
Compression stockings are prescribed for limb swelling and poor vein function in elderly people. Compression stockings do NOT work very well. I stopped ordering them for my patients in 1992 for three reasons:
1 Patients find the stockings miserable to wear and give up wearing them 85% of the time.
2 In spite of the “Times†story, the Health Care Financing Administration (HCFA) has made a decision to NOT pay for compression stockings in Medicare and Medicaid patients because these do not meet HCFA effectivness critera. (Again compliance is low because stockings are hot to wear, uncomfortable, and hard to put on. The cure is worse than the disease. I agree with the HCFA.
3 The four compression stocking companies that market to my vascular surgery patients — JUZO, Jobst, MediVan and Sig Varis — charge huge prices for their “medical product” in spite of the fact that Medicare and Medicaid do not pay for the stockings. Compression stockings have been “medicalized” by these companies to bring higer prices in the market place.
Compression stockings are not amazing, not worth $239 and are not a clear issue to use when talking about a one payer health system in the United States to replace our present health system. There are far cheaper and better options which I recommend to my patients.
Welcome to the ambigous real world of medicine.
Martin J Winkler MD FACS
Mwinklermd@gmail.com
Medical Director, Compression Dynamics LLC
Comment by Martin J. Winkler MD FACS — August 9, 2009 @ 11:14 pm
Post a Comment