Want to know what's happening next in healthcare?

MedCityNews is the leading online news source for the business of innovation in healthcare.


“MedCity news is a peerless national resource for those of us who really want to stay on top the very latest news in healthcare from incumbents to startups. ”

Elliot Menschik, DreamIt Ventures partner; Venturef0rth founder; Penn professor


Sign up for our daily newsletter


McDonald’s, healthcare reform and the ‘mini-meds’

3:05 am by | 2 Comments

Last week the Wall Street Journal reported that health reform might compel McDonald’s to drop the health insurance plan it offers it restaurant employees. Why? Because the plan doesn’t pay out a minimum of 85 percent of premiums in medical costs and has annual benefits caps under $750,000. McDonald’s denied the report but it has the ring of truth.

Republicans quickly grabbed the issue an another cudgel to beat over the head of PPACA proponents. Some Democrats, including Senator Jay Rockefeller, want to investigate McDonald’s and its health insurer to see whether workers are getting value from such plans.

In my view, McDonald’s is smart to offer the plans it does, and both Democrats and Republicans are going off in the wrong direction with their criticisms.

McDonald’s offers a “mini-med” plan, also known as a limited benefit plan.These plans are in some ways the opposite of insurance: they pay for routine health care expenses but not catastrophic ones. Benefits are often capped at $25,000 to $50,000 per year. The McDonald’s plans have even lower caps, in the range of $2,000 to $10,000. As a result they are frequently castigated as a bad deal by policy experts and other people with easy access to comprehensive insurance. Back in 2007 (Understanding the appeal of Mini-Meds) I wrote about Tennessee Governor Phil Bredesen, who embraced mini-meds as an affordable solution. Here’s what I wrote:

[From the Wall Street Journal]:

…Gov. Bredesen says he listened to focus groups and queried blue-collar folks, such as a waitress at a waffle restaurant, to devise his plan. “They weren’t interested in buying insurance for catastrophic events. They wanted access to the emergency room next month, access to the pharmacy next month,” he says. “Let’s give people what they want instead of what some advocate says they want.”

What Bredesen understands, but [experts] downplay, is that a $10,000 or $25,000 or $50,000 debt falls into the “catastrophic” category for a lot of people. It can mean filing for bankruptcy or taking many years to dig out of debt. There’s not such a big difference between owing $50,000 and owing $1 million. Both amounts are in the category of not being repayable. Many people who run up debts of either amount are going to be eligible for Medicaid in any case.

On the other hand, if a person of modest means buys a comprehensive policy, it’s likely to be expensive and have high deductibles and co-pays. In addition to having to scrape together the money to pay the premium every month, a moderately expensive episode of care could still end up causing financial hardship or ruin.

For example:

Sherry Slatton, 46, a nine-year veteran in the Pepper Patch kitchen, dropped her comprehensive health insurance through her husband’s employer. The couple enrolled in the CoverTN plan, and their monthly cost will drop to about $175 from $350. Ms. Slatton wasn’t happy with the old coverage, which she says stuck her with $4,000 in charges when she underwent surgery to remove a benign cyst.

According to PayScale, fast food workers make around minimum wage of $7.25 per hour. At 40 hours per week, 50 weeks per year that comes out to $14,500 before taxes. As a comparison, that’s less than what a comprehensive health insurance costs for a family in the Boston area. So there’s absolutely no way McDonald’s can offer such insurance. By contrast, the McDonald’s plans cost $14 to $32 per week, which equates to $700 to $1600 per year.

The real tragedy –which I haven’t seen mentioned– is that even these low wage workers pay into Medicare. Even though the workers don’t have comprehensive insurance they’re paying to cover senior citizens, including plenty of wealthy people who don’t need or deserve the help.

In the meantime, it’s likely the Secretary of Health and Human Services will use her authority to exempt mini-med plans from the law’s provisions.

Copyright 2014 MedCity News. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

David E. Williams

By David E. Williams

David E. Williams is the co-founder of MedPharma Partners who writes regularly on the Health Business Blog.
Visit website | More posts by Author

2 comments
Krendall
Krendall

Before the new healthcare law, these people had no protection if they had one of these "non catastophic" plans, and then went into the hospital for any length. And since they leave the bill unpaid, the cost is passed onto you and me. But starting in 2014 a family of 4 that makes 33,000 or less will qualify for Medicade under the new law.McDonalds is part of what is csausing our health care problem by not providing real health insurance and just because they pay pathetic wages to its employees is no reason to let the company off the hook.Whole Foods market has been doing the same thing (pay low enough - poverty level - then let Medicaid cover employees).Now all companies will go that direction (even tho most already were doing that before the law anyhow).

Micah
Micah

This is a very good and simple recap on "mini-meds" in terms of why they are needed, and the shortsightedness by many of our politicians when they were shoving through HR 3962.