Medicare Advantage plans could see payment reductions of 1.9 percent next year under proposed rates announced Friday by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.
Insurers, who have led a fierce lobbying campaign against payment reductions, have said the combination of the health law’s lower payment rates, new fees on health plans and other factors, including automatic federal spending cuts known as “sequestration,” mean that Medicare Advantage plans will see their Medicare payment rates drop by 6 percent – or even more — in 2015.
CMS said Friday its preliminary estimate is “the combined effect of the Medicare Advantage growth percentage and the fee-for-service growth percentage.”
With the Rise of AI, What IP Disputes in Healthcare Are Likely to Emerge?
Munck Wilson Mandala Partner Greg Howison shared his perspective on some of the legal ramifications around AI, IP, connected devices and the data they generate, in response to emailed questions.
America’s Health Insurance Plans said they are reviewing the details of the announcement to determine the total impact of the federal payment rates. In a statement, AHIP President and CEO Karen Ignagni was critical of the proposed rates, saying, “The new proposed Medicare Advantage cuts would cause seniors in the program to lose benefits and choices on which they depend.”
According to a new analysis from consulting firm Avalere Health, enrollment in Medicare Advantage plans rose in 2014 by 8.9 percent to 15.9 million enrollees, up from 14.6 million in 2013. Approximately 30 percent of Medicare beneficiaries are enrolled in the plans, which are offered by private insurance companies.
The government provides payments to the insurers for Medicare-covered benefits, such as hospital and physician services, but the plans often offer extra benefits, such as hearing aids or gym memberships, that are not available in traditional Medicare. Most Medicare Advantage plans require that beneficiaries receive care from physicians, hospitals and other providers that contract with those plans. Traditional fee-for-service allows beneficiaries to visit any doctor or provider that accepts Medicare.
Insurers and other Medicare Advantage advocates said earlier this month that cuts could cause premium increases and benefit reductions.
A Personalized Approach to Medication Nonadherence
At the Abarca Forward conference earlier this year, George Van Antwerp, managing director at Deloitte, discussed how social determinants of health and a personalized member experience can improve medication adherence and health outcomes.
For years, Medicare Advantage plans were paid on average more per beneficiary than what Medicare paid for beneficiaries enrolled in traditional fee-for-service. The health law aims to equalize that federal spending over time, so the government pays the same amount whether a beneficiary enrolls in Medicare Advantage or traditional Medicare. Cuts to Medicare Advantage plans are part of the $716 billion in Medicare spending reductions the health law calls for over the next decade.
Those cuts were strong ammunition for Republicans in the 2010 congressional midterm elections when the GOP recaptured the House and in the 2012 presidential contest. In a recent flurry of letters to the administration, both Democrats and Republicans have expressed concerns about the impending cuts.
Republicans wasted no time Friday criticizing the proposed cuts. “The hard truth is now apparent – millions of seniors who rely on the Medicare Advantage program will lose the plans, benefits, doctors and financial protection they currently have,” said Rep. Dave Camp, R-Mich., chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee. Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, the ranking Republican on the Senate Finance Committee, said the proposed reductions “threaten a successful program for seniors, and must be overturned. Medicare Advantage is extremely popular for a reason – run through the private market, seniors gain access to high-quality and coordinated care with additional benefits that they otherwise wouldn’t get. Regrettably, this administration continues to undermine this critical program.”
But others say the payment changes are needed. “The reductions should continue to go into effect in order to ensure more parity between [Medicare Advantage] plans and traditional Medicare with respect to how much is spent on beneficiaries,” the Center for Medicare Advocacy wrote Thursday. “Further, if overall Medicare costs continue to grow more slowly than expected, which is good news for Medicare and the federal budget, [Medicare Advantage] payment should be adjusted accordingly. There is no reason [Medicare Advantage] payment should increase at the same time that overall Medicare costs are slowing.”
The costs of plans – and the additional benefits they may offer — vary widely around the country. Insurers UnitedHealthcare and Humana make up more than 40 percent of Medicare Advantage enrollees.
Last year, Medicare officials initially proposed reducing Medicare Advantage payments by 2.2 percent, but after another strong industry lobbying campaign, the administration switched gears and raised the rate by 3.3 percent. A “star rating” system for Medicare Advantage plans also helped buffer the reductions in prior years.
AHIP has already begun a grassroots lobbying effort that includes television and print advertisements with seniors reminding members of Congress that they are a potent voting bloc. The group also funded a study that shows the cumulative effect of the expected cuts, coupled with other federal spending reductions, means that beneficiaries could face premium increases and benefit reductions of $35 to $75 per month, or $420 to $900 if Medicare Advantage payments are reduced by 6 percent in 2015.
Some analysts say it makes no sense to cut payments to a popular program. “Our concern is that if the program is not sustainably funded, it may not be able to keep up with a demand that is only going to increase,” wrote Douglas Holtz-Eakin and Kenneth Thorpe, co-chairs of the Partnership for the Future of Medicare, a bipartisan group that advocates for programs to make Medicare secure. In their Feb. 11 letter to Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Administrator Marilyn Tavenner, Eakin and Thorpe also wrote “our fear is that additional cuts to the [Medicare Advantage] program in 2015 could mean that millions of [Medicare Advantage] beneficiaries will lose access to their preferred health plans and doctors and drive more beneficiaries into the flawed fee-for-service system.”
Holtz-Eakin is a former director of the Congressional Budget Office who now heads the American Action Forum, a right-leaning think tank. Thorpe is chairman of the Partnership to Fight Chronic Disease and chairs the Department of Health Policy & Management at Emory University. During the Clinton administration, Thorpe was deputy assistant secretary for health policy at the Department of Health and Human Services.
Final Medicare Advantage payment rates for 2015 are scheduled to be released in April.
Photos courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
KHN staff writer Phil Galewitz contributed.
