BioPharma, Legal

Ex-BARDA director says he was ousted for questioning hydroxychloroquine for Covid-19

Rick Bright, who had been director of the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority since 2016, is now filing a whistleblower complaint, saying he was placed in a more limited position at the NIH pushing back against promotion of hydroxychloroquine.

The former director of an agency under the Department of Health and Human Resources that is heading efforts to develop vaccines and drugs for Covid-19 says he was ousted over his opposition to the Trump administration’s promotion of two malaria drugs as treatments for the disease.

Rick Bright, who had been in charge of the Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority, or BARDA since 2016, now plans to file a whistleblower complaint about his removal, as director of BARDA and as HHS deputy assistant secretary for preparedness and response, and placement in a more limited position at the National Institutes of Health. In a statement sent via email on behalf of Katz, Marshall & Banks, the law firm representing him, Bright said he believes the move was in response to his questioning of the promotion of hydroxychloroquine and a related drug, chloroquine.

“Specifically, and contrary to misguided directives, I limited the broad use of chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine, promoted by the Administration as a panacea, but which clearly lack scientific merit,” Bright said in his statement. “While I am prepared to look at all options and to think ‘outside the box’ for effective treatments, I rightly resisted efforts to provide an unproven drug on demand to the American public. I insisted that these drugs be provided only to hospitalized patients with confirmed COVID-19 while under the supervision of a physician.”

STAT news originally reported on Bright’s departure, and The New York Times reported his statement.

Bright added that he had also resisted efforts to fund “potentially dangerous drugs” promoted by people with political connections.

Citing an anonymous source, NBC News reported Thursday that Bright was pushed to increase access to the drug after President Donald Trump had a conversation about it with Oracle Chairman Larry Ellison, a supporter of Trump and donor to his campaign.

“Sidelining me in the middle of this pandemic and placing politics and cronyism ahead of science puts lives at risk and stunts national efforts to safely and effectively address this urgent public health crisis,” Bright said in his statement.

The Food and Drug Administration issued an emergency use authorization last month for hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine, though it was limited to patients unable to take part in clinical trials, in response to a request by Bright. The EUA followed heavy promotion of hydroxychloroquine as a potential “game changer” by President Donald Trump and similar promotion by supportive media figures. However, that led to runs on the drugs in several areas of the country, making them difficult to obtain for patients with diseases for which they are indicated, such as lupus and rheumatoid arthritis. The FDA’s decision has been called a political one that risks undermining faith in the agency, while the publicity-generated interest risks making it harder to recruit patients into trials of other drugs.

Actual clinical data on the drugs has been mixed, at best. While some small studies have indicated a benefit in Covid-19 patients – notwithstanding criticism over their methodology – others have shown no benefit, and others still have indicated they may do more harm than good. A panel of experts convened by the National Institutes of Health has recommended against use of hydroxychloroquine and the antibiotic azythromycin outside of clinical trials due to the potential for toxicity.

In a subsequent statement, issued Thursday, Bright’s attorneys said they would be filing the whistleblower complaint with the HHS inspector general and Office of Special Counsel over what they called the retaliatory treatment he received for raising concerns about the White House’s promotion of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine. They accused the administration of making “demonstrably false” statements about him to deflect attention from their alleged retaliatory removal of him as director of BARDA.

“In our filing we will make clear that Dr. Bright was sidelined for one reason only — because he resisted efforts to provide unfettered access to potentially dangerous drugs, including chloroquine, a drug promoted by the Administration as a panacea, but which is untested and possibly deadly when used improperly,” the statement read. “The facts and concerns raised by Dr. Bright are compelling and well-documented and soon they will be public.”

Requests for comment from HHS have been made.

Photo: Mark Wilson, Getty Images

Shares0

This article is featured in the Healthcare Docket newsletter, a partnership between Breaking Media publications MedCity News and Above the Law.

Enter your email address to subscribe.

Shares0